1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 57 Ohio
  5. 57 Ohio St. 3d 50 (1991)
 

STATE v. MATEO

No. 89-1768.

57 Ohio St. 3d 50 (1991)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE, v. MATEO, APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided January 16, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John T. Corrigan, prosecuting attorney, and Michael D. Horn, for appellant and cross-appellee.

Paul Mancino, Jr., for appellee and cross-appellant.

ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J.

The state of Ohio has appealed that portion of the court of appeals' decision vacating the forfeiture of appellee's motor vehicle. Appellee has crossappealed raising various issues. We will first address the state's arguments on appeal.

I

The state argues that the court of appeals erred when it applied R.C. 2933.43(C) to the present case. We agree. Appellee was indicted in count three with a violation of R.C. 2925.13, which...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases