HOLT v. BOOTH

Docket No. E007798.

1 Cal.App.4th 1074 (1991)

2 Cal. Rptr.2d 727

DAVID HOLT, Cross-defendant and Appellant, v. JOHN BOOTH, Cross-complainant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two.

December 19, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Rivers J. Morrell III, Belcher, Henzi & Biegenzahn and Raymond E. Hane III for Cross-defendant and Appellant.

Butterwick, Babcock, O'Laughlin & Bright, John F. O'Laughlin and Elizabeth Helene Adamson for Cross-complainant and Respondent.


[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

OPINION

TIMLIN, J.

The primary issue raised on appeal by the appellant (Holt) in this case is whether he was acting within the course and scope of his employment by respondent (Booth) when he (Holt) negligently injured a third party. We will conclude that there is sufficient evidence to support the judgment entered below to the effect that Holt was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases