MATTER OF PISACANE v. KING


175 A.D.2d 894 (1991)

In the Matter of Joann Pisacane, Appellant, v. Lloyd King, Jr., et al., Respondents, and Peter A. Chema et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

August 21, 1991


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the petitioner's contention, the omission of the term "I do hereby appoint" from that portion of the designating petition relating to the committee to fill vacancies did not render the petition invalid. Although Election Law § 6-132 does not permit deviations from the statutorily prescribed content of designating petitions, it does permit "substantial compliance" with the statutorily...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases