1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 169 A.D.2d
  5. 169 A.D.2d 898 (1991)
 

NAISMITH v. SCOVILLE

169 A.D.2d 898 (1991)

Stuart D. Naismith et al., Respondents, v. Helene E. Scoville et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

January 10, 1991

Casey, J. P.

On this appeal, defendant Helene E. Scoville (hereinafter defendant) claims that Supreme Court erred in summarily granting plaintiff's motion for accelerated judgment of foreclosure and in striking defendant's affirmative defense of unconscionable conduct. We disagree and find no reason to disturb the determination of Supreme Court. Defendant was the sole mortgagor on the mortgage that covered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases