JACKSON v. ALERT FIRE & SAFETY EQUIP.

No. 89-1770.

58 Ohio St. 3d 48 (1991)

JACKSON ET AL., APPELLANTS AND CROSS-APPELLEES, v. ALERT FIRE AND SAFETY EQUIPMENT, INC. ET AL., APPELLEES; SOUTH AKRON AWNING ET AL., APPELLEES AND CROSS-APPELLANTS.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided March 6, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel M. Walpole and Paul E. Weimer, for appellants and cross appellees.

Roetzel & Andress, George A. Clark and Orlando J. Williams, for appellees.

Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs and David W. Hilkert, for appellees and cross-appellants.


DOUGLAS, J.

The issue before this court focuses on whether the court of appeals properly concluded that summary judgment should be granted in favor of Alert and Murdock, and denied, except as to the intentional infliction of emotional distress claim, as to Levinson's and Awning. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the court of appeals' ruling.

I

Alert and Murdock

First we turn our attention to whether the trial court and court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases