1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 229 Cal.App.3d
  5. 229 Cal.App.3d 832 (1991)
 

ROE v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. B052812.

229 Cal.App.3d 832 (1991)

280 Cal. Rptr. 380

LAURIE KEIKO ROE, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; CLINTON H. ROE, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

April 26, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Jones, Mahoney & Brayton and Thomas C. Brayton for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Vandenberg, Newell, Curtis & Nelson and Pamela Bourette-Schuur for Real Party in Interest.

OPINION

ORTEGA, J.

We conclude the psychotherapist-patient privilege does not apply in this civil action to information reported by a psychotherapist pursuant to the Child Abuse and Neglect Reporting Act. (Pen. Code, § 11171, subd. (b)).1 We deny the petition for a writ of mandate to compel the superior court to vacate the order requiring the limited deposition of petitioner's psychotherapist, and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases