MUNOZ v. KEANE

Nos. 91-CIV-0954 (LJF), 91-CIV-3195 (LJF).

777 F.Supp. 282 (1991)

David MUNOZ, Petitioner, v. KEANE, Respondent. Zoilo LINARES, Petitioner, v. SENKOWSKI, Respondent.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

November 4, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Munoz, pro se.

Simpson Thacher & Bartlett by John J. Kenney, Andrew S. Amer, New York City, for petitioner Zoilo Linares.

Robert M. Morgenthau, Dist. Atty., New York County by Nikki Kowalski, Asst. Dist. Atty., New York City, for respondents.


ORDER AND OPINION

FREEH, District Judge.

In these related cases, Linares v. Senkowski (91-CIV-3195) and Munoz v. Keane (91-CIV-0954), petitioners Zoilo Linares ("Linares") and David Munoz ("Munoz") seek writs of habeas corpus, primarily on the grounds that their prosecution by an individual not admitted to the bar of New York or any other state violated the due process clause of the federal constitution.1 Linares...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases