Even if it is accepted that defendant properly preserved for review the question of whether evidence of a prior uncharged crime should have been admitted, we find any claim of error lacking in merit. Testimony concerning the uncharged crime, as well as defendant's prior arrests and appearances before the victim, a Town Justice, was directly related to motive and its probative worth exceeded its potential for prejudice (see, People v Johnson,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. BARNUM
169 A.D.2d 887 (1991)
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Gregory D. Barnum, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
January 10, 1991
January 10, 1991
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
