There is no evidence in the record to support petitioner's claim that he was denied a fair and impartial hearing. As to his claim that he was justified in refusing a direct order because he had a right not to be compelled to attend another hearing, the record fails to indicate that the ordered interview was a hearing; even if it was, that was not justification for refusing to obey the order (see, Matter of Rivera v Smith,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF SCOTT v. LEONARDO
178 A.D.2d 865 (1991)
In the Matter of Joseph Scott, Petitioner, v. Arthur Leonardo, as Superintendent of Great Meadow Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
December 31, 1991
December 31, 1991
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
