DeFRIES v. POST

CV 89-0962; CA A67018.

815 P.2d 224 (1991)

108 Or.App. 298

James E. DeFries, Appellant, v. Peter Anthony POST, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 31, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alan Gallagher, La Grande, argued the cause, for appellant. On the brief were Wade P. Bettis, Jr., and Bettis & Ricker, P.C., La Grande.

Bruce L. Mowery, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief, for respondent.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., JOSEPH, C.J., and DEITS, J.


RICHARDSON, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff appeals a judgment for defendant in this action arising out of the collision of their vehicles. The judgment was based on the jury's finding that plaintiff's comparative fault exceeded defendant's. Plaintiff's sole assignment is that the court erred by allowing a police officer, who was called in to investigate the day after the accident, to give expert testimony about the speed at which plaintiff was driving before the accident...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases