1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 582 N.E.2d
  5. 582 N.E.2d 457 (1991)
 

CITY OF HOBART v. CHIDESTER

No. 45A04-9010-CV-00487.

582 N.E.2d 457 (1991)

CITY OF HOBART, Indiana, Appellant-Defendant, v. Jeffrey L. CHIDESTER, On Behalf of Himself and All Other Owners of Land in Appealing from and in Remonstrating against Annexation of Territory Set Forth in City Ordinance 89-20 of the City of Hobart, Indiana, Whose Names As Owners of Land Are Too Numerous to Recite in This Caption, but Whose Names Are Set Forth and Appear On Exhibit "a" Attached Hereto the Complaint and Made a Part Thereof, Appellees-Plaintiffs.

Court of Appeals of Indiana, Fourth District.

December 12, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Debra Lynch Dubovich, Goodman Ball & Van Bokkelen, Highland, James A. Greco, Greco, Pera & Bishop, Merrillville, for appellant-defendant.

Richard A. Mayer, Gregory J. Tonner, Spangler, Jennings & Dougherty, Merrillville, for appellees-plaintiffs.

CHEZEM, Judge.

CASE SUMMARY

Appellant-Defendant, City of Hobart (Hobart), appeals from a judgment in favor of Appellees-Plaintiffs, Jeffrey L. Chidester et al. (Remonstrators), holding Annexation Ordinance 90-06 invalid. We affirm.

ISSUES

I. Did the trial court lack subject-matter jurisdiction over the remonstration proceeding?

II. Does Ind. Code 36-4-3-13(d)(4) and (5) require Hobart...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases