The sentence imposed, while the harshest defendant could have received, was in accord with the plea bargain agreement and within the statutory guidelines (Penal Law § 70.15 [1]). Defendant was specifically told that no promises were being made as to sentencing and that he could receive consecutive prison terms. Therefore, there was no abuse of discretion by County Court in sentencing defendant to consecutive prison terms of one year each (see, People v Bailey...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
