1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 229 Cal.App.3d
  5. 229 Cal.App.3d 802 (1991)
 

ZAMBRANO v. OAKLAND UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST.

Docket No. A049698.

229 Cal.App.3d 802 (1991)

280 Cal. Rptr. 454

MARIO ZAMBRANO et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. OAKLAND UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Five.

April 26, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Lois Salisbury, Armando M. Menocal III, Laura Schulkind, Susan Spelletich, Altshuler, Berzon, Nussbaum, Berzon & Rubin, Fred Altshuler and Jeffrey B. Demain for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Celia Ruiz, Karen E. Gilyard and Barbara S. Van Ligten for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

KING, J.

In this case we hold that a provision in a consent decree for attorney fees for future successful judicial enforcement does not constitute a waiver of statutory attorney fees for nonjudicial enforcement proceedings which are a prerequisite to judicial enforcement.

Mario Zambrano appeals from an order denying his motion for attorney fees.

In June 1985, Zambrano and the Oakland Unified School District...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases