LOMAX v. GIBSON

89-1449.

584 So.2d 445 (1991)

James P. LOMAX, Jr. v. W. Kenneth GIBSON, et al.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Rehearing Denied May 24, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James P. Lomax, Jr., pro se.

W.A. Kimbrough, Jr. and Frank Woodson of Turner, Onderdonk, Kimbrough & Howell, Mobile, for appellee W. Kenneth Gibson.

Philip H. Partridge and James W. Tarlton IV of Brown, Hudgens, Richardson, P.C., Mobile, for appellee Daniel A. Benton.

Jerry A. McDowell and Walter T. Gilmer, Jr. of Hand, Arendall, Bedsole, Greaves & Johnston, Mobile, for appellee Sam W. Irby.


ADAMS, Justice.

This is a legal malpractice action wherein the trial judge entered a summary judgment in favor of Kenneth Gibson, former attorney of the plaintiff, James P. Lomax, Jr. The sole issue raised by Lomax in his appeal is whether the statutory period of limitations had run when Lomax filed his malpractice action. We affirm.

In 1980, Gibson practiced with the firm of Taylor, Benton, Irby and Gibson. While Gibson was practicing with that firm, Lomax...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases