1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.Y.2d
  4. 78 N.Y.2d
  5. 78 N.Y.2d 944 (1991)
 

HUDSON-PORT EWEN ASSOCS. v. KUO

78 N.Y.2d 944 (1991)

Hudson-Port Ewen Associates, L.P., Respondent, v. Chien Kuo et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided July 9, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen M. Rathkopf and Arthur G. Jakoby for appellants.

Robert S. Carlson for respondent.

Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA concur.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Where consideration of a contract as a whole resolves the ambiguity created by one clause, there is no occasion to consider extrinsic evidence of the parties' intent (W.W.W. Assocs. v Giancontieri, 77 N.Y.2d 157, 162-163). We agree with the Appellate Division majority that the contract in this...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases