JANUZZI v. HICKMAN

No. 90-1297.

61 Ohio St.3d 40 (1991)

JANUZZI ET AL., APPELLEES, v. HICKMAN; FORD MOTOR COMPANY, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 26, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas A. Januzzi, for appellees.

Thompson, Hine & Flory, Keith A. Ashmus and Joel R. Hlavaty, for appellant.


MOYER, C.J.

The sole question presented for our review is whether garnishee Ford may appeal from the municipal court's order to pay into court. We hold that Ford may not appeal, and therefore we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Prior case law has unequivocally held that a garnishee is not a party to a garnishment proceeding. As stated in the second paragraph of the syllabus in Secor v. Witter (1883), 39 Ohio St. 218, "* * * a garnishee who...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases