1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 161 Wis.2d
  5. 161 Wis.2d 854 (1991)
 

DIPPEL v. WIS. PATIENTS COMP. FUND

No. 90-1740.

161 Wis.2d 854 (1991)

468 N.W.2d 789

Michael D. DIPPEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WISCONSIN PATIENTS COMPENSATION FUND, Lew Papendick, M.D., John Romano, M.D., Charul Munshi, M.D., Michael Hert and Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital, Defendants-Respondents, James R. SANGER, M.D., Wisconsin Health Care Liability Insurance Plan and ABC Insurance Companies To Be Named, Defendants.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided March 27, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the plaintiff-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Edward P. Rudolph, of Elm Grove.

On behalf of defendant-respondent, Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund, the cause was submitted on the brief of James M. Fergal and Linda Vogt Meagher of Schellinger & Doyle, S.C. of Brookfield.

On behalf of the defendants-respondents, Lew Papendick, M.D., and Charul Munshi, M.D., and for defendants, James R. Sanger and Wisconsin Health Care Liability Insurance Plan, the cause was submitted on the brief of Donald R. Peterson and Peter F. Mullaney of Peterson, Johnson & Murray, S.C. of Milwaukee.

On behalf of the defendant-respondent, Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital, the cause was submitted on the brief of Keith W. Kostecke, of Menn, Nelson, Sharratt, Teetaert & Beinstein, LTD. of Appleton.

Before Nettesheim, P.J., Brown and Scott, JJ.

NETTESHEIM, P.J.

This is a medical malpractice action. The claimant, Michael D. Dippel, appeals from a summary judgment dismissing his action against defendants Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital, Lew Papendick, M.D., John Romano, M.D., Charul Munshi, M.D., Michael Hert and the Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund (collectively, health care providers). The circuit court's summary judgment ruling did not affect other defendants against whom Dippel's action continues...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases