PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Donald Rodger, appeals his conviction and sentence for grand theft. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
Appellant was convicted of grand theft and sentenced as a habitual offender. Appellant contends, and the State concedes, that appellant's sentence as a habitual offender must be reversed because the trial court failed to make the requisite findings to support the habitual sentence. See Smith v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.