STAND TALL ON PRINCIPLES v. SHASTA U. HIGH SCH.

Docket No. C010513.

235 Cal.App.3d 772 (1991)

1 Cal. Rptr.2d 107

STAND TALL ON PRINCIPLES, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SHASTA UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

October 28, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Mayer & McNeill, Mayer, McNeill & Martinez and Walter P. McNeill for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Moss & Enochian and John Sullivan Kenny for Defendants and Respondents.


OPINION

DAVIS, J.

The issue presented by this appeal is whether the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that a school district complete an environmental impact report (EIR) during the course of selecting a site for a new high school, or whether it is sufficient if the district completes an EIR prior to acquiring such a site. "It is circumstance and proper timing that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases