1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 818 S.W.2d
  5. 818 S.W.2d 183 (1991)
 

DIEHL v. ROCKY MOUNTAIN COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

No. 13-91-050-CV.

818 S.W.2d 183 (1991)

James R. DIEHL, et ux, Appellants, v. ROCKY MOUNTAIN COMMUNICATIONS, INC., d/b/a Cable Services, Inc., Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi.

October 17, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ryan E. Stevens, William N. Ambler, Law Offices of Ryan E. Stevens, Corpus Christi, for appellants.

Thomas E. Nye, Brin & Brin, Corpus Christi, for appellee.

Before SEERDEN, KENNEDY and HINOJOSA, JJ.

OPINION

SEERDEN, Justice.

James Diehl appeals from a summary judgment granted against him and in favor of Rocky Mountain Communications (RMC), in a suit alleging intentional spoliation of evidence. By five points of error, Diehl complains that the court erred in granting the summary judgment because he pleaded a viable cause of action, because the court incorrectly applied the applicable statute of limitations...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases