BELL TELEPHONE CO. v. COMMERCE COM'N

Nos. 2-89-1228, 2489-0914, 2-89-1308, 2-89-1350, 2-90-0037, 2-90-0039, 2-90-0042, 2-90-0043 and 2-90-0072.

561 N.E.2d 426 (1990)

203 Ill. App.3d 424

149 Ill.Dec. 148

ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, Appellant, v. The ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION, Appellee. The PEOPLE ex rel. OFFICE OF PUBLIC COUNSEL, et al., Appellants, v. The ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION, et al., Appellees.

Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District.

October 3, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward A. Butts (argued), Illinois Bell Telephone Co., Louise A. Sunderland, John C. Gockley, Richard N. Janney, and Lincoln V. Janus, Illinois Bell Telephone Co., Chicago, for Illinois Bell Telephone Co.

John F. Ward, Jr., Henry T. Kelly, Michael W. Ward (argued), O'Keefee, Ashenden, Lyons & Ward, Chicago, for Independant Coin Payphone.

Douglas W. Trabaris, Rudnick & Wolfe, Chicago, Jean Roche, Citizens Utility Bd., Evergreen Park, Deborah Senn, Citizens Utility Bd., Henry T. Kelly, Thomas H. Rowland (argued), Asst. State's Atty., Public Utilities Div., Allen W. Cherry, Legal Assistance Foundation of Chicago 91017, Bernard Rane, Asst. Corp. Counsel, Robert W. Cushing, Jeff Deutschman, Asst. Attys. Gen., Public Utilities Div., Chicago, Arnstein & Lehr, Barrington, Paul J. Maton, Chicago, Andrew D. Lipman, Swidler & Berlin, Washington, D.C., Donald E. Glickman, Hilda C. Contreras, James D. Roberts, Rudnick & Wolfe, Sheila Macmanus, Supervisor, Public Utilities Div., Stephen J. Moore, Karen L. Lusson, Asst. Public Counsel, Office of Public Counsel, Chicago, for other appellants.

Clyde Kurlander, Illinois Commerce Com'n, Gen. Counsel, Chicago, John P. Kelliher, Kathleen Nolan (argued), Sp. Asst. Attys. Gen., Illinois Commerce Com'n, Rose Claggett, Chief Clerk, Springfield, for Illinois Commerce Com'n.

Neil F. Hartigan, Atty. Gen., Karen L. Lusson, Asst. Public Counsel (argued), Stephen J. Moore, Office of Public Counsel, Ana C. Cusack, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Chicago, for the People.


Justice REINHARD delivered the opinion of the court:

These consolidated appeals are taken from an order of the Illinois Commerce Commission (the Commission) issued in response to rate sheets filed by Illinois Bell Telephone Company (Bell) seeking the adoption of new and restructured telephone rates. The order adopted a new rate schedule incorporating a usage sensitive service (USS) pricing structure and a modified regulatory plan (MRP). The Commission denied all motions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases