1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 154 Wis.2d
  5. 154 Wis.2d 821 (1990)
 

STATE v. SCHLEUSNER

No. 89-1444-CR.

154 Wis.2d 821 (1990)

454 N.W.2d 51

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Bill SCHLEUSNER, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided February 27, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For defendant-appellant there were briefs by William E. Schmaal, Madison.

For plaintiff-respondent there was a brief by Donald J. Hanaway, attorney general and David J. Becker, assistant attorney general of the Wisconsin Department of Justice, Madison.

Before Cane, P.J., LaRocque and Myse, JJ.

MYSE, J.

Bill Schleusner appeals his conviction for nonsupport, contrary to sec. 940.27(2), Stats. (1985-86). He argues that the jury instructions unconstitutionally relieved the state of its burden to prove intent and to prove his inability to pay support. Schleusner also argues that there was insufficient evidence to support the guilty verdict. We conclude that the jury instructions did not relieve the state of its burden of proof and that there was sufficient evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases