SHARPLES v. STATE

No. 13966.

793 P.2d 175 (1990)

Caroline SHARPLES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE of Hawaii, William F. McCook, John Does 1-5, John Doe Corporations 1-5, John Doe Partnerships 1-5, Roe Partnerships 1-5, and Roe Governmental 1-5, Defendants-Appellees.

Supreme Court of Hawaii.

June 4, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter Cahill (James Krueger and Timothy P. McNulty, on the briefs), Wailuku, for plaintiff-appellant.

Gale L.F. Ching (Laurence K. Lau with him on the brief), Deputy Attys. Gen., Honolulu, for the State.

Before LUM, C.J., PADGETT, HAYASHI and WAKATSUKI, JJ., and NAKAMURA, Retired Justice, Assigned by Reason of Vacancy.


LUM, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff-Appellant Caroline Sharples appeals from a grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee the State of Hawaii. Sharples claims in her suit that psychiatrist Dr. William F. McCook, a State employee, had sex with her while she was McCook's patient, and that the State is liable under a theory of respondeat superior for injuries caused to her by reason of the sex. We agree with the court below that summary judgment is appropriate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases