PEOPLE v. HAINSON


161 A.D.2d 802 (1990)

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. George Hainson, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

May 29, 1990


Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the prosecution failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt his identity as the person who committed the charged offenses is without merit. While the testimony of the prosecution witnesses contained some minor inconsistencies, these discrepancies did not render their accounts incredible (see, e.g., People v McCaskill, 144 A.D.2d 496; People v...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases