CHAMPLIN PETROLEUM CO. v. GOLDSTON CORP.

No. 13-89-489-CV.

797 S.W.2d 165 (1990)

CHAMPLIN PETROLEUM COMPANY, Appellant, v. GOLDSTON CORPORATION, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi.

Rehearing Overruled October 4, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William R. Kendall, Jr., Reno, Nev. and J. Michael Mahaffey, Corpus Christi, for appellant.

Amy E. Harren and Ray Alexander, Corpus Christi, for appellee.

Before NYE, C.J., and BENAVIDES and SEERDEN, JJ.


OPINION

BENAVIDES, Justice.

Champlin contests a judgment denying its claim for contractual indemnity against Goldston. By point one, Champlin asserts that the trial court erred, pointing out that Goldston failed to plead and prove that Champlin was negligent. By point two, Champlin states that no evidence shows it was negligent. The question raised concerns the burden of proof when the indemnity clause does not meet the express negligence rule and the indemnitee...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases