U.S. v. PERRY

Crim. No. 89-0162-24.

754 F.Supp. 202 (1990)

UNITED STATES of America v. Constance PERRY.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

June 8, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jay B. Stephens, U.S. Atty., District of Columbia, John P. Dominguez and David Schertler, Asst. U.S. Attys., for the Government.

Daniel Ellenbogan, Kensington, Md., for defendant Rayful Edmond, III.

Cynthia Lobo, Washington, D.C., for defendant Melvin Butler.

Elise Haldane, Washington, D.C., for defendant James A. Jones.

Joseph Conte, Washington, D.C., for defendant Jerry Millington.

Leroy Nesbitt, Washington, D.C., for defendant Tony Lewis.

Ernest McIntosh, Jr., Washington, D.C., for defendant Willie Childress.

Catherine Brown, Washington, D.C., for defendant Keith Cooper.

Arthur M. Levin, Washington, D.C., for defendant Columbus Daniels.

William Garber, Washington, D.C., for defendant Rachelle Edmond.

Stuart F. Johnson, Washington, D.C., for defendant Robert Hardy.

Thomas Slawson and Richard Beizer, Washington, D.C., for defendant Bernice Hillman McCraw.

Robert Werdig, Jr., for defendant David McCraw.

Leonard Long, Washington, D.C., for defendant John Monford.

Robert Sanders, Washington, D.C., for defendant Armaretta B. Perry.

W. Gary Kohlman, Washington, D.C. for defendant Constance D. Perry.

Sol Rosen, Washington, D.C., for defendant Melvin Stewart.

Retna Pullings, Washington, D.C., for defendant Jeffrey Thompson.

Nina Kraut, Washington, D.C., for defendant Raynice Thompson.


ORDER

CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.

The defendant Constance Perry filed a motion for a mistrial on March 30, 1990 on the ground that the sequestration and anonymity of the jury in the above-captioned case prejudiced her.1 There is empirical evidence demonstrating that defendant's motion is lacking in merit and that the anonymity and sequestration of a jury does not work to a defendant's detriment. On December 6, 1990, the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases