KING COUNTY v. SQUIRE INVESTMENT CO.

No. 25057-4-I.

59 Wn. App. 888 (1990)

801 P.2d 1022

KING COUNTY, Appellant, v. SQUIRE INVESTMENT CO., ET AL, Respondents.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

As amended by order January 18, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Norm Maleng, Prosecuting Attorney, Frederick A. Kaseburg, Special Deputy, and Stanley D. Tate, Deputy, for appellant.

Robert Johns, William Hickman, Darrell S. Mitsunaga, and Reed McClure, for respondent Squire Investment Co.

Ruth Tressel, for respondent Metropolitan Seattle.

Daryl A. Deutsch, for respondents Davidson, et al.


[As amended by order of the Court of Appeals January 18, 1991.]

FORREST, J.

King County appeals from the trial court's grant of summary judgment to Squire Investment Company (Squire) and to Davidson in a condemnation/quiet title action, in which the court found that the disputed property was either a railroad right of way or a fee simple determinable. King County also appeals from the court's supplemental judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases