1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 901 F.2d
  5. 901 F.2d 40 (1990)
 

ALEXANDER v. INDUSTRIES OF THE BLIND, INC.

Nos. 89-2041, 89-2062.

901 F.2d 40 (1990)

Annie R. ALEXANDER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. INDUSTRIES OF THE BLIND, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided April 17, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Grady Lee Shields, Carruthers & Roth, P.A., Greensboro, N.C., for defendant-appellant.

J. Wilson Parker, Wake Forest University School of Law, Winston-Salem, N.C., for plaintiff-appellee.

Kenneth R. Keller, Carruthers & Roth, P.A., Greensboro, N.C., on brief, for defendant-appellant.

Jonathan R. Harkavy, Smith, Patterson, Follin, Curtis, James & Harkavy, Greensboro, N.C., on brief, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and FOX, District Judge for the Eastern District of North Carolina, sitting by designation.

WIDENER, Circuit Judge:

Industries of the Blind, Inc. (Industries) appeals from a decision by the district court finding that it violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by discriminating against Annie R. Alexander on the basis of gender. Industries argues that the district court erred by refusing to enforce an oral settlement agreement, and that the district court erroneously found that it intentionally discriminated against

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases