STATE v. SACCO


242 N.J. Super. 699 (1990)

577 A.2d 1333

STATE OF NEW YORK AND THOMAS C. JORLING, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, v. FRANK SACCO, LILLIAN SACCO, MATERIAL TRANSPORT SERVICE AND DART CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Bergen County.

Decided May 10, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph R. Fischer, for plaintiffs (Clemente, Strenk & Kiernan, attorneys).

Alan Liebowitz, for defendants (Liebowitz & Liebowitz, attorneys).


LAWRENCE D. SMITH, J.S.C.

The essential issue addressed in this opinion is whether the "penal exception" to the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the United States Constitution precludes enforcement of a series of New York judgements which imposed substantial sanctions on defendants for contempt of court based on their failure to comply with an earlier judgement. For the reasons expressed herein, I find the sanctions involved, because they were intended to be coercive...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases