1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 747 F.Supp.
  5. 747 F.Supp. 191 (1990)
 

RANDOM HOUSE, INC. v. CURRY

No. 88 Civ. 3193 (MGC).

747 F.Supp. 191 (1990)

RANDOM HOUSE, INC., Plaintiff, v. George E. CURRY, and Sylvester Monroe, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

May 1, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Satterlee Stephens Burke & Burke by Robert M. Callagy, David G. Curran, New York City, for plaintiffs.

George E. Curry, Washington, D.C., pro se.

Sylvester Monroe, Los Angeles, Cal., pro se.

OPINION AND ORDER

CEDARBAUM, District Judge.

Random House moves for summary judgment against defendants George Curry and Sylvester Monroe1 pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons discussed below, the motion is denied.

BACKGROUND

On October 19, 1984, Random House entered into a contract with George Curry, Sylvester Monroe and Kenneth...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases