On October 25, 1989, in the presence of their attorneys, the parties appeared before Justice Wilk in open court and agreed to the provisions of a stipulation of settlement. Subsequently, defendant moved to vacate and set aside the stipulation of settlement on the grounds that it was unfair and unconscionable. Upon review of the record before the IAS court and the terms of the stipulation of settlement, we agree that the stipulation was neither the product of coercion nor...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
