1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 795 S.W.2d
  5. 795 S.W.2d 139 (1990)
 

RAINEY v. RAINEY

795 S.W.2d 139 (1990)

Phillip A. RAINEY and William B. Rainey, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. J.R. RAINEY, Tommy Ray Rainey, Joseph H. Mangum and Mary Jo Elam Mangum, Executrix of the Estate of Eugene Mangum, Deceased, Defendants-Appellees. Joseph H. MANGUM and Mary Jo Elam Mangum, Executrix of the Estate of Eugene Mangum, Deceased, Counter-Cross-Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. J.R. RAINEY, Jr., Tommy Ray Rainey, Coleen F. Rainey, Cross-Defendants-Appellants, Phillip A. Rainey, William B. Rainey, Counter-Defendants-Appellants, and William J. Rainey, Cross-Defendant-Appellant. John R. RAINEY, Jr, Tommy Ray Rainey, Counter-Cross-Plaintiffs-Appellees, and Coleen F. Rainey, Cross-Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Phillip A. RAINEY, William B. Rainey, Counter-Cross-Defendants-Appellants, William J. Rainey, Cross-Defendant-Appellant, v. Phillip Anthony Rainey and Tracy Ann Buttrey, Cross-Defendants.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Middle Section, at Nashville.

Application for Permission to Appeal Denied July 23, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

T. Edward Lawwell, Lawwell, Dale & Grahm, Columbia, for plaintiffs-counter and cross-defendants appellants Phillip A. Rainey, William B. Rainey and William J. Rainey.

Tom W. Moore, Jr., Moore & Peden, P.C., Columbia, for defendants, counter and cross plaintiffs-appellees Joseph H. Mangum and Mary Jo Elam Mangum, executrix of the estate of Eugene Mangum, deceased.

Robert L. Jones and James W. Couch, Trabue, Sturdivant & DeWitt, Columbia, for defendants-cross defendants-counter and cross-plaintiffs-appellees John R. Rainey, Jr., Tommy Ray Rainey, and Coleen F. Rainey.

Application for Permission to Appeal Denied by Supreme Court July 23, 1990.

OPINION

LEWIS, Judge.

This case involves a dispute over the ownership of a 157 acre farm (the farm) located in Maury County, Tennessee, and a question of whether William J. Rainey, the beneficiary of his brother's life insurance policies and employee benefit plans, had an obligation to use the proceeds in a particular manner.

The majority of the parties in this case...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases