1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 743 F.Supp.
  5. 743 F.Supp. 184 (1990)
 

HERBSTEIN v. BRUETMAN

No. 89 Civ. 6864 (RWS).

743 F.Supp. 184 (1990)

Diego J. HERBSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. Martin E. BRUETMAN, High Tech Medical Parks Development Corp., Ronald Tash, Douglas Kiell, Mauricio Agudelo, and Alta Tecnologia Medica, S.A., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

July 11, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Summit Rovins & Feldesman, New York City, for plaintiff; Ronald E. DePetris, Marion Bachrach, Seth F. Kaufman, of counsel.

Sperling, Slater & Spitz, Chicago, Ill., for defendants; Stephen J. Spitz, Gregg R. Hague, of counsel.

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Defendants Dr. Martin Bruetman ("Bruetman"), Ronald Tash ("Tash"), Mauricio Agudelo ("Agudelo"), High Tech Medical Parks Development Corporation ("High Tech"), Douglas Kiell ("Kiell"), and Alta Tecnologia Medica S.A. ("Altec") (collectively, the "Bruetman defendants") have moved to dismiss plaintiff Dr. Diego Herbstein's ("Herbstein") case on the grounds of comity or forum non conveniens, or alternatively, to stay the case...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases