STATE v. PITTMAN

No. 90-0840.

159 Wis.2d 764 (1990)

465 N.W.2d 245

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Maurice C. PITTMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided December 19, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Craig M. Kuhary, and Matthew H. Huppertz, of Carlson & Huppertz, S.C. of Waukesha.

On behalf of the plaintiff-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of Donald J. Hanaway, attorney general and Michael R. Klos, assistant attorney general.

Before Nettesheim, P.J., Brown and Anderson, JJ.


NETTESHEIM, P.J.

The issue in this case is whether the seizure of parolee Maurice C. Pittman in his residence upon a parole violation apprehension request was valid under the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution. We hold that such a seizure comports with the reasonableness requirement of the fourth amendment. Therefore, we affirm Pittman's conviction for unlawfully possessing a firearm as a convicted felon pursuant to sec. 941.29(1)(a) and (2), and sec...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases