GENERAL MILLS v. ILL. COMMERCE COMM'N

No. 1-89-0491.

201 Ill. App.3d 715 (1990)

559 N.E.2d 225

GENERAL MILLS, INC., Petitioner-Appellant, v. THE ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION et al., Respondents-Appellees.

Appellate Court of Illinois — First District (5th Division).

Opinion filed July 27, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eric Robertson and Edward C. Fitzhenry, both of Lueders, Robertson & Konzen, of Granite City, for petitioner.

Neil F. Hartigan, Attorney General, of Springfield (Amy S. Botschner, Special Assistant Attorney General, of Chicago, of counsel), for respondent Illinois Commerce Commission.

Sidley & Austin, of Chicago (Sarah J. Read and Anastasia M. Polek, of counsel), for respondent Commonwealth Edison Company.


Order affirmed.

JUSTICE LORENZ delivered the opinion of the court:

General Mills, Inc. (General Mills), appeals from an order of the Illinois Commerce Commission (Commission) denying its complaint against Commonwealth Edison Company (Edison). We address the issue of whether the Commission properly found Edison's rate schedule was ambiguous on its face and properly examined other documents to construe the rate schedule. For the following reasons, we affirm...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases