DOTSKO v. DOTSKO


244 N.J. Super. 668 (1990)

583 A.2d 395

MICHAEL DOTSKO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CHARLENE DOTSKO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. MICHAEL DOTSKO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CHARLENE DOTSKO, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 7, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael Dotsko appeared pro se.

Caryl Wolfson Leightman argued the cause for respondent (Caryl Wolfson Leightman, on the brief).

Before Judges DREIER, ASHBEY and LANDAU.


The opinion of the Court was delivered by ASHBEY, J.A.D.

For purposes of this opinion, we have consolidated two appeals from the Family Part. Michael Dotsko appeals pro se from a judgment of divorce and incidental Family Part rulings. Defendant Charlene Dotsko separately appeals concerning a reservation of counsel fees in a post-divorce motion.

Michael and Charlene Dotsko were married on October 19,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases