SCHMITZ v. STRANSKY

No. C2-89-1789.

454 N.W.2d 455 (1990)

Teresa Ann McColley SCHMITZ, Appellant, v. Mark Edward STRANSKY, a/k/a Mark Edward Rand, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied June 25, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steve Alpert, Rice County Atty., Paige M. Snover, Asst. Rice County Atty., Faribault, for appellant.

David Hvistendahl, Hvistendahl & Moresch, P.A., Northfield, for respondent.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Craig R. Anderson, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, for Intervenor State of Minnesota.

Considered and decided by PARKER, P.J., and FORSBERG and NORTON, JJ.


OPINION

NORTON, Judge.

Appellant Theresa Ann McColley Schmitz ("McColley") seeks review of the trial court's denial of her motion for a new trial in a paternity action. After a jury returned a verdict in favor of respondent Mark Stransky a/k/a Mark Rand ("Stransky"), McColley moved for a new trial alleging as error three evidentiary rulings.

Respondent Stransky filed a notice of review seeking review of orders which require him to reimburse the county...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases