SCHULTZ v. HARTFORD FIRE INS. CO.

(13668)

213 Conn. 696 (1990)

JANE CRILLY SCHULTZ, ADMINISTRATRIX (ESTATE OF ANDREW G. SCHULTZ) v. HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decision released February 13, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leo Gold, for the appellant (plaintiff).

Paul E. Pollock, with whom, on the brief, was Thomas P. Parrino, for the appellee (defendant Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company).

HEALEY, SHEA, GLASS, COVELLO and HULL, JS.


ARTHUR H. HEALEY, J.

The principal issue in this case is whether an endorsement to an owners', landlords' and tenants' liability insurance policy amends or adds to the policy provisions defining insured premises. The trial court, Ryan, J., found the definition of insured premises in the endorsement controlling and interpreted the provision so as to deny the plaintiff relief under the insurance policy. From this judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases