1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 550 N.E.2d
  5. 550 N.E.2d 349 (1990)
 

SPINSKY v. KAY

No. 71A04-8810-CV-339.

550 N.E.2d 349 (1990)

Anthony Paul SPINSKY and Florence M. Spinsky, Appellants (Defendants below), v. Carl KAY, Appellee (Plaintiff below).

Court of Appeals of Indiana, Fourth District.

Rehearing Denied May 9, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert J. Palmer, May, Oberfell & Lorber, Charles A. Sweeney, Jr., Sweeney, Pfeifer & Blackburn, South Bend, for appellants.

Robert F. Gonderman, Craig A. Rieff, Gonderman Law Offices, P.C., South Bend, for appellee.

CONOVER, Judge.

Defendants-Appellants Anthony Paul Spinsky and Florence M. Spinsky (collectively, Spinsky) appeal the trial court's judgment in favor of Plaintiff-Appellee Carl Kay (Kay).

We affirm.

Spinsky presents five issues for our review,1 which we restate as:

1. whether the trial court erred in ordering specific performance of an option to purchase real property...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases