STATE v. HUTTON

No. 88-1074.

53 Ohio St. 3d 36 (1990)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE, v. HUTTON, APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided August 8, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John T. Corrigan, prosecuting attorney, and George J. Sadd, for appellant and cross-appellee.

Floyd B. Oliver and David L. Doughten, for appellee and cross-appellant.


MOYER, C.J.

The state advances seven propositions of law in support of its appeal. Hutton, cross-appealing certain aspects of the court of appeals' decision, asserts seven propositions of his own. For the reasons that follow, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and remand to that court for further proceedings.

I

The court of appeals held that Eileen Sweeney's testimony that Hutton raped her was inadmissible under R.C. 2945.59, the substantial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases