1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 458 N.W.2d
  5. 458 N.W.2d 434 (1990)
 

STATE v. LOZAR

Nos. C5-89-2144, C0-89-2200.

458 N.W.2d 434 (1990)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Larry LOZAR, Appellant (C5-89-2144), Eloise Rae Lozar, Appellant (C0-89-2200).

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied September 28, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Robert A. Stanich, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Bruce L. Anderson, Lake County Atty., Two Harbors, for State of Minn.

Steven J. Meshbesher, Andrew S. Birrell, Meshbesher, Birrell & Dunlap, Minneapolis, for Larry Lozar.

Allan H. Caplan, Harlan M. Goulett, Allan H. Caplan & Associates, Minneapolis, for Eloise Rae Lozar.

Considered and decided by LANSING, P.J., and FORSBERG and SCHULTZ, JJ.

OPINION

HAROLD W. SCHULTZ, Judge.

Appellants Larry and Eloise Rae Lozar were jointly charged in Lake County District Court with possession of marijuana with intent to sell or distribute, and possession of marijuana by a dealer without affixing state tax stamps. The charges against the Lozars arose following the seizure, pursuant to warrant, of approximately 750 pounds of marijuana from their greenhouse, garage and residence. Following an omnibus hearing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases