Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We agree with the hearing court that the in-court identification of the defendant by the prosecution witness, Arturo Ramirez, had a source independent of the suggestive photographic identification procedure (see, People v Ballott,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.