Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, we find that the County Court correctly denied his motion to suppress his confession based on his claim that he was placed in custody without probable cause. This confession was obtained after the defendant voluntarily accompanied detectives to a police station. Prior to his arrival at the police station, he was given his Miranda warnings (see, Miranda v Arizona,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.