Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
At trial, the defendant did not request a jury instruction on the defense of intoxication and its effect on intent. Therefore, the defendant failed to preserve this issue for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]). Reversal is not warranted in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction since there was insufficient evidence of the defendant's intoxication for a reasonable person to entertain doubt as to the element...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
