1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 564 N.E.2d
  5. 564 N.E.2d 302 (1990)
 

WATSON v. GOLDEN RULE INS. CO.

No. 45A03-9002-CV-67.

564 N.E.2d 302 (1990)

Robert H. WATSON, Appellant (Defendant below), v. GOLDEN RULE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee (Plaintiff below).

Court of Appeals of Indiana, Third District.

December 19, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nathaniel Ruff, Lesniak & Ruff, East Chicago, for appellant.

Michael V. Gooch, John S. Beeman, Sandra S. Carr, Harrison & Moberly, Indianapolis, for appellee.

STATON, Judge.

Robert H. Watson appeals a summary judgment in favor of Golden Rule Insurance Company (Golden Rule) denying coverage under a health insurance policy and rescinding the policy. He raises four issues for our consideration, which we consolidate and rephrase as follows:

Whether the trial court properly granted summary judgment in favor of Golden Rule on the basis that the terms of the insurance policy allowed Golden Rule to rescind the contract...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases