1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 239 N.J.
  5. 239 N.J. Super. 620 (1990)
 

STATE v. WILLIAMS

239 N.J. Super. 620 (1990)

571 A.2d 1358

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CLAUDE WILLIAMS, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 23, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John H. Stamler, Union County Prosecutor, attorney for appellant (Steven J. Kaflowitz, Assistant Prosecutor, of counsel and on the letter brief).

Michael V. Kerwin, attorney for respondent Claude Williams.

Before Judges PETRELLA, HAVEY and STERN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by PETRELLA, P.J.A.D.

The issue on this appeal is whether a defendant's right to cross-examination was violated when he was precluded from questioning a police officer about the precise location of his vantage point during a pre-arrest surveillance.1 The trial judge ruled that the surveillance point would have to be disclosed in a new trial in order...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases