MARANATHA MINING v. PIERCE COUNTY

No. 12951-5-II.

59 Wn. App. 795 (1990)

801 P.2d 985

MARANATHA MINING, INC., ET AL, Appellants, v. PIERCE COUNTY, ET AL, Respondents.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two.

December 10, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William T. Lynn, Stephanie A. Arend, and Gordon, Thomas, Honeywell, Malanca, Peterson & Daheim, for appellants.

John W. Ladenburg, Prosecuting Attorney, and Stephen R. Shelton, Deputy, for respondent Pierce County.

Joseph F. Quinn and McCormick, Hoffman, Rees, Faubion, Quinn & Van Buskirk, P.S., for respondents Sunnen, et al.


WORSWICK, J.

We reverse the Pierce County Council's denial of Maranatha Mining's1 application for an unclassified use permit to operate a surface gravel mine and asphalt plant, and we direct that the permit be issued.

Maranatha owns a 60-acre parcel in a general use zone near McMillan on which it wants to conduct gravel mining and asphalt manufacturing. Such uses are permitted in general use zones under unclassified use permits...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases