Opinion by Judge PLANK.
Defendant, Charles E. Brack, appeals the trial court's order denying his Crim.P. 35(c) motion. He argues that the denial of his motion as untimely constituted reversible error, as did the denial of his request for appointed counsel. We disagree and, therefore, affirm.
Defendant argues that he is entitled to the five-year grace period established by the supreme court in People v. Fagerholm,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.