The complainant testified that he was robbed at knifepoint while withdrawing money from a bank cash machine. Defendant's conviction for robbery in the first degree was based, in part, on the testimony of complainant and two police officers and the fact that he was found in possession of complainant's eyeglass prescription.
Defendant now argues that his guilt was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt due to inconsistencies in the complainant's and police officers' testimony...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
