INGRAM, Presiding Judge.
After an ore tenus proceeding, the trial court divorced the parties and effectuated a property settlement. The husband appeals, contending that the trial court's division of property was inequitable and is due to be reversed. The husband also contends that the trial court erred in reserving the issue of alimony and in awarding $1,250 in attorney's fees to the wife.
It is well established that the issues of which the husband complains...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
